Polar Capital Technology (PCT) has released its half year results for the six months ending 31 October 2022 and, over this period it has reported a NAV return of -9.1% and share price return of -7.2%, compared to the -8.9% of its benchmark, the Dow Joes World Technology Index.
PCT’s discount was 9.6% as of its half-year end, narrowing from the 11.5% discount it reported at its previous financial year end (30 April 2022). This was in part the result of 2.9m shares the board repurchased over the six-month period, representing 2.3% of the total issued capital. PCT traded on a 9.7% discount as of 09 December 2022.
The largest individual detractor to PCT’s performance relative to its benchmark was its underweight position in Apple, although the market rotation away from growth towards value stocks during the period proved more costly in aggregate. Fortunately, the impact of this ameliorated PCT’s underweight allocation to Asia, while its average cash position of 4.7% and NDX put options were positive contributors.
PCT also benefited from select stock level outperformance. Robust data centre spending growth benefited its holdings of both Arista Networks and Pure Storage. While strong earnings progress helped chipmakers Lattice Semiconductor and ON Semiconductor. Other examples include Enphase energy, which benefited from higher energy prices; as well as Axon Enterpise an E lnk, which benefited from the demand for public security software.
The six-month period was another active one for PCT. The management team, led by Ben Rogoff, raised cash by c.3%, while also increasing PCT’s underweight to mega-cap technology stocks (>$100bn market cap) from -14.8% to -24.1%, in favour of large caps ($50-$100bn market cap). This partially reflected the team’s decision to modestly reduce their US exposure in favour of Japanese, European and Latin American stocks that had previously underperformed.
At a sector level, the team reduced their exposure to e-commerce, advertising and social media companies, citing the impact of higher interest rates. Specific companies included DoorDash, Etsy, and Snap. They also further reduced their remaining exposure to work from home beneficiaries, selling both Twilio and Zoom. Higher risk-free rates and wider high-yield spreads saw the team reduce exposure to longer-duration companies and/or those with weaker balance sheets, including Coupa Software, Ocado and Seagate Technology.
The proceeds were invested into the next-generation of infrastructure software companies, such as Confluent and Gitlab, and payment-related assets, including Adyen, Bill.com, Flywire and GMO Payment Gateway, following significant valuation compression. They also took advantage of lower growth stock valuations within medical technology, buying DexCom and Intuitive Surgical.
Much of the team’s concerns about the near-to-medium term outlook are macro-economic in nature, the most prominent downside risk for the market being uncontrolled inflation. In addition to the other prevailing risks like a tighter labour market. The team comment that monetary policy may still surprise to the upside or remain restrictive for longer than markets are currently anticipating. They do offer some upside risks which can offset the pessimism, such as the fact that we may already be at peak inflation. They also believe that strong household and consumer finances could limit a potential downturn.
At a sector level, the team highlight that the technology sector will have to contend with the combination of higher risk-free rates, slowing growth and some margin degradation which makes for a more challenging immediate outlook for the technology sector. The magnitude of the multiple compression also reflects a sharp reversal in sentiment around the ‘inevitability’ of technology disruption which reached a zenith during the pandemic. The stronger US dollar has also weighed on the sector, as worldwide IT spending this year is now expected to grow by only 0.8% year on year in 2022, compared to 4% anticipated in April. However, the team no longer have the same concern about next-generation valuations that they did a year ago prior to the Fed pivot, with the valuation compression seeing next-generation stocks give up all and more of their pandemic rerating. As such the team see much improved risk/reward in this group of stocks and have been moving the portfolio in this direction, companies such as infrastructure software firms Confluent and Gitlab.
Ben comments that: “Even if technology stocks have struggled to live up to their pandemic billing, we remain believers in the primacy of technology and excited about humankind’s ability to innovate and reimagine industries. This – above all else – should provide a fertile backdrop against which to invest.”
[QD comment: “The relative concentration of the technology sector is an issue for tech investing, as is reflected in PCT’s half year results, given the impact its underweight to Apple had on PCT’s relative performance. In practice, it is effectively impossible for active technology managers to have the same mega-cap weightings as their benchmarks while maintaining an appropriate level of diversification. The question we believe investors need to ask themselves is whether we are now past peak inflation (the primary factor behind the selloff) and market valuations are already accounting for higher discount rates, in which case PCT’s discount offers an attractive entry point into a market which may become more bullish towards technology stocks. Or, is there more downside to come given the wide array of prevailing risk factors (economic recessions, geopolitical risks, China’s COVID-19 responses to name a few). If one is of the same mindset of PCT, it may thankfully be the former.”]
previous story | next story
This website is for information purposes only and is not intended to encourage the reader to deal in any mentioned securities. QuotedData is a trading name of Marten & Co Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Some of the content in this website is sponsored and, although it abides by Content Principles and Objectives, (/about-quoteddata/research-principles-objectives/) it is considered non-independent. Investments may involve a significant degree of risk, including loss of capital. The value of an investment and the income from it could go down as well as up. The return of your investment is not guaranteed, and you may get back less than you originally invested. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. It is important that you read the Terms and Conditions (/about-quoteddata/terms-and-conditions/) before considering any investment.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Related Content
Thank you to everyone that listened in today, whether you watched the Zoom live, on Facebook or on YouTube. In this week’s show, James Carthew covered the week’s […]
Polar Capital Technology dragged down by tech retrenchment after last year’s outperformance – Polar Capital Technology (PCT) has posted its final results for the year to 30 April […]
About Polar Capital Technology Trust Polar Capital Technology Trust is run by a team of 9 professionals dedicated exclusively on the technology sector, which has been one of […]
Ben Rogoff – Fund Manager Ben joined Polar Capital in May 2003. He is lead manager of Polar Capital Technology Trust plc and is a Fund Manager of […]
It is no secret that the US is the biggest player in the technology space, with a market value of about $1.5trn compared to a global market value […]
Polar Capital Technology held back by widening discount – Polar Capital Technology Trust has published results for the year ended 30 April 2021. The 12-month period was one where […]
The last few weeks have given English football fans – and probably non-football fans alike – a much-needed boost of energy and excitement after 18 months of on-and-off […]
Related Content
North Atlantic Smaller Companies delivered an NAV return of 9.2% over the year ended 31 January 2022. The chairman notes that this compares with a rise in the sterling adjusted Standard & Poors Composite Index of 24.0%. The Standard and Poors Composite Index was, however, not representative of the US market in general; for example, […]
Polar Capital Global Healthcare (PCGH) has released its annual results for the year ended 30 September 2021, during which it has provided NAV and share price total returns of 19.46% and 24.55%, strongly outperforming its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Health Care Index, which returned 13.40%. Since its restructuring to 30 September 2021, PCGH has provided […]
Polar Capital Technology held back by widening discount – Polar Capital Technology Trust has published results for the year ended 30 April 2021. The 12-month period was one where the sector performed extremely well but gave back some of its returns in the final couple of months. The trust just failed to match its benchmark, returning […]
Merchants Trust (MRCH) has reported final results to 31 January 2021. The UK equity income trust’s NAV total return with debt at market value fell by 12.4% compared with a 7.5% decrease in the benchmark FTSE all-share index. Around half of the difference was the result of portfolio gearing, which exacerbates market movements, in either direction. This […]
The Independent Investment Trust (IIT) has announced its annual results for the year ended 30 November 2020, during which it recovered in the second half, despite reducing equities in March. Over the year, IIT produced a net asset value (NAV) total return of -2.2%. Its chairman, Douglas McDougall, says that, over the same period, theoretical […]
Polar Cap Global Healthcare caught out by COVID – Polar Capital Global Healthcare has published results for the year ended 30 September 2020. The NAV return for the period was 14.1%, a bit behind the return on the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Health Care Index) of 15.9%. As the discount widened, shareholders were left with a […]
Polar Capital Technology (PCT) has published unaudited results for the half-year to 31 October 2020. In NAV per share terms, PCT returned 28.1%, while the market return came in at 18.1%. The benchmark Dow Jones World Technology Index delivered a return of 23.9%. ‘Internet and software subsectors lead relative performance’ PCT’s manager, Ben Rogoff, had this to say: “Internet companies […]
JPMorgan Elect (JPE) has released its annual results for the year ended 31 August 2020. The trust manages a number of different pools and shareholders have the option to switch between these periodically. Key highlights from the report are provided below, as well as the investment manager’s reports for all of the individual share classes. […]
US-focused Polar Capital Global Healthcare (PCGH), reported interim results this morning, covering the six months to 31 March 2020. The portfolio’s NAV total return over the period was (5.97%), compared to a 0.34% return from the benchmark MSCI ACWI/Healthcare index PCGH noted that the early part of the period was challenging for fundamental investors, as we […]
Polar Capital Technology has published results for the year ended 30 April 2014 that show its net assets growing by 11.2% and its share price by 10.9% but both lagging the increase in the Dow jones World Technology Index of 13.1%. Very strong gains and outperformance of the index were given up in the last six […]
This website is for information purposes only and is not intended to encourage the reader to deal in the security or securities mentioned.
Please review our cookie, privacy & data protection and terms and conditions policies and, if you accept, please select your place of residence and whether you are a private or professional investor.
You live in…
You are a…
Due to data protection policies, USA residents can not access our data.
Curating your content
Your content has been curated