How Russia could cut itself off from the global Internet, and why it probably won't – Euronews

In the weeks since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, the country’s government, led by President Vladimir Putin, has moved to tighten its grip on the flow of information about the war.
It has targeted social media, blocking Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Russian media outlets have been targeted by a new law that threatens closure and even jail time for spreading so-called “fake news” about the war.
Now, the censorship of information about the invasion of Ukraine has fuelled speculation that the Russian government is planning to take its control of information online to the next level – by cutting the country off from the global Internet.
There has long been evidence that the Kremlin aspires to separate the Russian Internet from the rest of the world.
After elections in 2011 led to widespread protests in Russia over allegations of electoral fraud, the Kremlin began to take the threat the Internet posed to its authority more seriously, Alena Epifanova, a researcher at the German Council on Foreign Relations, told Euronews Next.
“This idea of a so-called ‘sovereign Internet’ is not that new,” she said.
“When people went to the streets in 2011, 2012, I think the Kremlin realised what kind of power a free Internet and social media networks have for democracy, for people, for protests,” she said.
After that happened, Russian authorities began to ask internet service providers and network hosting services to block or restrict certain content on request.
“But, you know, it’s a super ineffective way to remove information,” Epifanova said.
Then, in 2019, Russian lawmakers approved a series of amendments to the country’s communications laws collectively known as the “Sovereign Internet Law”. These obliged Russian Internet service providers to install equipment to monitor Internet traffic and centralised control of the country’s communications networks.
They also brought about the creation of a Russian DNS, or “domain name system,” a crucial piece of infrastructure if Russia were to separate its Internet from the rest of the world.
But despite the government’s efforts, Russia is not ready to make the switch to a domestic DNS, Epifanova said.
“The system of its implementation is so non-transparent, we simply don’t know which stage they are at now,” she said.
One sign that this is the case is the resistance of Russian Internet service providers to government pressure to transfer their services, despite the threat of fines for non-compliance.
“They are still able to connect to the global DNS and that’s why they prefer to pay fines, rather than to connect to the national DNS and have some damages with this system,” Epifanova said.
Another factor is Russia’s economic and technological reliance on the outside world.
Unlike in China – another country that has tightly controlled Internet access – Russia’s attempt at building a “sovereign Internet” is relatively recent. The country is far more integrated into the global internet, and far more economically reliant on the access it provides.
“Russia is a bit more complicated, because from the very beginning a lot of different domestic and international actors were involved in building the internet infrastructure, and in the IT market there are still too many actors and also private actors, providing different services, infrastructure, and access to the internet, to IP protocols,” Epifanova told Euronews Next.
In the weeks since the invasion of Ukraine began, chipmakers, software providers and financial services have stopped doing business with Russian customers as sanctions take hold.
Among the companies pulling out of the country was the American internet service providers Cogent, one of the largest Internet backbone providers in the world, and Lumen, one of the largest international data transport providers in Russia.
In a March 4 email to Russian customers, Cogent cited “the economic sanctions put in place as a result of the invasion and the increasingly uncertain security situation,” as well as “the unwarranted and unprovoked invasion of Ukraine” as reasons for the shutdown.
While international ISPs pulling out of Russia will not cut the country off from the Internet, it will limit bandwidth, potentially lowering the speed of Internet traffic as remaining providers become increasingly congested.
A blog by Doug Madory, Director of Internet Analysis at network tracking firm Kentik, highlighted the potential for traffic disruption: Cogent’s top three customers in Russia prior to pulling out of the country were the state telecom operator Rostelecom, as well as Megafon and VEON, two of the country’s top three mobile network operators.
Limiting Russian Internet access has also become a strategic goal for Ukraine, which petitioned ICANN – the non-profit organisation that maintains the global DNS – to revoke Russia’s access.
But in a response to Ukrainian vice prime minister Mykhailo Fedorov, ICANN CEO Göran Marby said his organisation would not take action.
“Our mission does not extend to taking punitive actions, issuing sanctions, or restricting access against segments of the Internet – regardless of the provocations,” Marby wrote.
One argument against cutting off Russia’s Internet access is that it could limit Russians’ access to accurate information from abroad about the war in Ukraine, according to Russian digital rights organisation Roskomsvoboda.
“Such actions will not lead to an improvement in the situation in Ukraine, yet they can significantly worsen the situation in Russia with regard to respect of fundamental human rights,” Roskomsvoboda said in a statement responding to Cogent’s decision to withdraw its services from Russia.
Cutting Russian access to the Internet could also play into the government’s hands, Roskomsvoboda argued, saying it could provide a “specious and convenient pretext” to “swiftly complete the process of isolating the [Russian internet] and the people of Russia from the rest of the world”.
The fallout from the war is also likely to severely impact Russia’s tech industry, Epifanova said, as it suffers the effect of sanctions and rising state control.
“When the whole world is talking about developing information technology which is needed for the future, Russia’s leadership does completely the opposite. It damaged everything that was already there, and it made the conditions for working in Russia absolutely impossible,” she said.
But despite rumours of a total decoupling from the global Internet, and the threat of growing censorship within the country, the huge rise in VPN traffic from Russia, as well as efforts to offer access to information via theanonymous Tor browser are a sign of hope, Epifanova told Euronews Next.
“This is my hope; that the IT community will develop new tools to get around these blockages and will be one step ahead,” she said.
“And that information will still be accessible in Russia, because it’s so important that people can get independent information on what’s going on in Ukraine”.
Share this article

source

Leave a Reply

Next Post

Cryptocurrency Industry Gives Dollars Political Campaigns, Not Bitcoin - Bloomberg

Tue Apr 12 , 2022
Bloomberg Markets Americas. Live from New York, is focused on bringing you the most important global business and breaking markets news and information as it happens.Bloomberg Markets live from New York, focused on bringing you the most important global business and breaking markets news and information as it happens.Quicktake Charge […]
%d bloggers like this: